EDINBURGH/ ROME/ BUCHAREST - What makes a mother fit to look after her children in the eyes of the authorities? And are these assessments shaped by systemic discrimination rooted in cultural and racial biases, particularly against racialised and migrant communities? These are the central questions that guided our investigation, focusing specifically on Roma and Black migrant families.

Our research examines this issue across three countries: Scotland and Italy, where immigration is a key feature of the social fabric, and Romania, where Roma communities represent a significant ethnic minority. Across these contexts, Roma and Black migrant families face distinct but overlapping forms of marginalisation, making them critical case studies for understanding how state interventions affect vulnerable populations across Europe.

In Italy, systemic discrimination against Roma families has been repeatedly condemned by the European Court of Human Rights. Yet, despite these rulings, authorities continue to rely, formally or informally, on ethnicity and cultural norms in assessing parental capability. Social services frequently lack the cultural competence necessary to respond sensitively, particularly in cases involving unreported domestic violence, where assumptions about cultural norms may override facts.

In Romania, data transparency is a major obstacle. The absence of ethnicity-disaggregated data on child protection makes it nearly impossible to measure the true impact of family separations on Roma communities. Furthermore, such interventions have been politicised by far-right actors who have used isolated incidents, often abroad (such as the Harehills riots), to vilify social services, stirring fear among Roma families and fuelling public misinformation and protest.

In Scotland, we have investigated how immigration enforcement intersects with child welfare systems. We’ve spent time with grassroots organisations in Scotland and London, hearing from them about how the lack of support at an early stage and an overly interventionist approach sees migrant children removed from their homes. We investigated the case of Nina, a mother from Southeast Africa, whose children were first taken into care while she was detained on immigration grounds, with four of her children eventually going into the care system. However, a detailed assessment later found that concerns that led to their removal stemmed in part from cultural misunderstandings and discrimination. Years later, her son died by suicide, laying bare the high stakes involved.

Organisations claim her story has echoes of the stories of many racialised and migrant mothers who lose custody of their children due to a combination of their unfamiliarity with local laws and a lack of cultural understanding in Scotland’s child protection system.

Illustration by Catherine Weir

Team members

Media

Mentors

Need resources for your own investigative story?

Journalismfund Europe's flexible grants programmes enable journalists to produce relevant public interest stories with a European mind-set from international, national, and regional perspectives.

Support independent cross-border investigative journalism

We rely on your support to continue the work that we do. Make a gift of any amount today.